Narrating the History: The Reinterpretation of Symbolic Reparation for the Reconciliation and Redemption of Child Victims of Conflict

Authors

  • Diana Carolina Cañaveral Londoño Lawyer of La Gran Colombia Seccional Armenia University, in Armenia-Quindío, Colombia, Cand idate for Master's degree in Public Law at the same University, Researcher, member of the Law, State and Citizenship Research Group of the Universidad la Gran Colo Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26417/ejis.v9i1.p98-107

Keywords:

Human rights, human rights violations, Peace research, Child welfare, Social justice

Abstract

:In Colombia there is a large sector of the population that has been the object of violation and ignorance of their human rights. They, like all victims of this type of violation, need to be repaired in a comprehensive manner. The concept of symbolic reparation that includes this integral reparation aims to reclaim the human being, to reconstruct it from the wounds and traces left by the violation of human rights in his memory. In a more sympathetic sense than is usually attributed to it, it seeks to bring the practice and experience of individuals to a level of abstraction that allows them to conceptualize a specific fact and articulate it with other concepts, so that the individual acquires adequate resilience. In this sense, the exercise and the experience of this reconstruction through the narratives, can provide certain conditions that make possible the process of symbolic reparation, which is exactly what it is tried to demonstrate with this investigation. This document is part of the research entitled "The narratives as a mechanism for the symbolic reparation of children victims of human rights violations", which seeks to understand the factors that make it possible to implement narratives as a mechanisms for symbolic reparation of children who are victims of human rights violations, as opposed to the symbolic reparations that have been erroneously ordered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the Colombian Supreme Court and Constitutional Court.

Downloads

Published

2017-10-06