Teachers' Opinions on Teaching and Assessing Methods in the Life Science Curriculum in the Context of Values

Authors

  • Cihat Yaşaroğlu Faculty of Art and Science, Bingol University, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v3i2.p107-112

Keywords:

Teaching values, assessing values, classroom teachers, life science course

Abstract

This research aims to investigate teachers' opinions about teaching and assessing methods that predicted in Life Sciences Course Curriculum (LSCC) in accordance of value education. Survey model was used in this research to achieve this aim. The study population consisted of 155 classroom teachers who serve in city center of Bingöl province, Turkey. An assessment instrument consisting of two chapters and developed by the researcher was used to collect data. The first chapter includes personal information about participants and the second chapter includes items that try to determine recommended teaching and assessing methods in LSSC. Arithmetic means and standard deviation were used for data analysis. It was found that teachers rated teaching and assessing methods proper. It is wished that this study will be useful for teachers, curriculum development specialists and decision makers in education system.

References

Bacanl?, H. (1999). Affective behavior education. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.

Education, A. (2005). The heart of the matter: Character and citizenship education in Alberta schools.

Halstead, J. M & Taylor M. J. (2000) Learning and Teaching about values: A review of recent research, Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(2), 169-202, DOI: 10.1080/713657146

Karasar, N. (2005). Scientific research method. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.

Kupchenko, I., & Parsons, J. (1987). Ways of Teaching Values: An Outline of Six Values Approaches.

Bouchard, N. (2002). A Narrative Approach to Moral Experience Using Dramatic Play and Writings. Journal of Moral Education, 31(4), 407-422.

Douglas, S. P., Ahrens, C., Hedstrom, J. E., Ford, L. J., & Johnson, P. L. (1976). Conceptual aproaches; Materials analyses, and an annotated bibliography. Boulder, Colo: Social Science Education Consortium.

Halstead, J. M., & Taylor, M. J. (2000). Learning and Teaching about Values: A review of recent research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(2), 169-202.

Kupchenko, I., & Parsons, J. (1987). Ways of teaching values: An outline of six values approach. Lickona, T. (1996). Teaching Respect and Responsibility. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 5(3), 143-151.

Lovat, T., Dally, K., Clement, N., & Toomey, R. (2011). Values Pedagogy and Student Achievement. Springer.

Verducci, S. (2000). A moral Method? Thoughts on Cultivating Emphaty Through Method Acting. Journal of Moral Education, 29(1), 87-99.

Veugelers, W. (2000). Different Ways of Teaching Values. Educational Review, 52(1), 37-46. Tekin. H. (n.d.). Assessment and evaluation in education. Ankara: Yarg? Publishing.

Ya?aro?lu, C. (2013). The compar?son of "l?fe sc?ence" ?n turkey to "c?t?zensh?p and moral educat?on" ?n s?ngapore ?n the context of values educat?on. International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8 (8), 1453-1461, Ankara-Turkey

Downloads

Published

2015-08-28

How to Cite

Teachers’ Opinions on Teaching and Assessing Methods in the Life Science Curriculum in the Context of Values. (2015). European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 2(2), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v3i2.p107-112