Developmental Patterns in the Interlanguage Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v6i2.p242-255Keywords:
developmental patterns, order of acquisition, sequence of acquisition, Processability Theory, frequency analysis, obligatory occasion analysis, target-like analysisAbstract
Interlanguage, defined as a dynamic language system created by the second language learners, can be studied by observing how the language of the learner develops over time. It is argued that interlanguage develops in a regular, predictable way. The regularity of interlanguage development can be confirmed by studying the order or the sequence of the acquisition of a certain structure. The former is studied by choosing one of the grammatical structures (i.e. plural-s), followed by collecting interlanguage samples to determine how often a certain structure is used and finally ranking the structure according to accuracy criteria. The latter deals with the detailed investigation of a certain feature (i.e. interrogatives) to show the sequence of stages through which a learner passes in his/her attempt to arrive at the target language. By studying syntactic structures, such as negatives and interrogatives, the regularities of the acquisition stages are most evident. The regularities have been found across many languages, in particular, English and German. To demonstrate that German language develops in a regular fashion, Processability Theory was proposed stating that L2 learners can produce only those L2 structures which they can process at any given point in time emphasizing thus the fact that developmental stages cannot be skipped. Furthermore, developmental patters can also be studied by applying obligatory occasion, target-like or frequency analysis. Both obligatory occasion and target-like analysis compare the learner's and the target language, whereas frequency analysis lists various linguistic devices used by the learner to express a certain grammatical structure and then shows the frequency of using a certain linguistic device.References
Baten, K. (2011). Processability Theory and German Case Acquisition. Language Learning, 61 (2), 455-505.
Bley-Vroman, R. (1983). The Comparative Fallacy in Interlanguage Studies: The Case of Systematicity. Language Learning, 33 (1), 1-17.
Bonilla, C.L. (2012). Testing Processability Theory in L2 Spanish: Can Readiness or Markedness Predict Development
(Doctoral thesis, University of Pittsburgh, USA). Retrieved from http://dscholarship.pitt.edu/11611/1/BonillaCL_2012.pdf.
Bonilla, C.L. (2014). From number agreement to the subjunctive: Evidence for Processability Theory in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research, 1-22.
Brown, R. (1973). A First Language: The first Stages. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Charters, H., Dao, L. & Jansen, L. (2011). Reassessing the applicability of Processing Theory: The case of nominal plural. Second Language Research, 27 (4), 509-533.
Corder, S.P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. IRAL, 10 (4), 159-170.
Decamp, D. (1971). Implicational Scales and Sociolinguistic Linearity. Linguistics, 17, 79-106.
Doman, E. (2012). Further Evidence for the Developmental Stages of Language Learning and Processability. US-China Education Review, 2 (9), 813-825.
Dulay, H. & Burt, M. (1974). Errors and Strategies in Child Second Language Acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 8 (2), 128-136.
Dyson, B. (2009). Processability theory and the role of morphology in English as a second language development: a longitudinal study. Second Language Research, 25 (3), 355-376.
Dyson, B. (2010). Learner Language Analytic Methods and Pedagogical Implications. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33 (3), 30.1-30.21.
Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2008). Investigating grammatical difficulty in second language learning: Implications for second language acquisition research and language testing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18 (1), 4-22.
Garcia Mayo, M. Junkal Gutierrez Mangado, M., Martinez Adrian, M. (Eds.) (2013). Contemporary Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (Eds.) (2012). The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. New York and London: Routledge. Taylor&Francis Group.
Hakansson, G. & Norrby, C. (2010). Environmental influence on language acquisition: Comparing second and foreign language acquisition of Swedish. Language Learning, 60 (3), 628-650.
Hakansson, G. (2013). Processability Theory. Explaining developmental sequences. In M. Garcia Mayo, M. Junkal Gutierrez Mangado & M. Martinez Adrian (Eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (pp. 111-129). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Han, Z.-H. & Tarone, E. (Eds.) (2014). Interlanguage: Forty years later. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Heinonen, E.M. (2009). Processbarhet på prov Bedömning av muntlig språkfärdighet hos vuxna andraspråksinlärare (Unpublished doctoral thesis, Uppsala Universitet, Sweden). Retrieved from http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:173105/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
Jansen, L. (2008). Acquisition of German Word Order. Language Learning, 58 (1), 185-231.
Kawaguchi, S. (2005). Argument structure and syntactic development in Japanese as a second language. In M. Pienemann (Eds.), Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory (pp. 253-299). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Keßler, J-U. & Keatinge, D. (Eds.) (2009). Research in Second Language Acquisition: Empirical Evidence across Languages. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Lowie, W. & Verspoor, M. (2015). Variability and Variation in Second Language Acquisition Orders: A Dynamic Reevaluation. Language Learning, 65 (1), 63-88.
Mansouri, F. (2005). Agreement morphology in Arabic as a second language. In M. Pienemann (Eds.), Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory (pp. 117-155). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Medojevi?, L. (2009). Applying Processability Theory and Its Extension to Serbian as a Family and Community Language in Australia. In J-U. Keßler & D. Keatinge (Eds.), Research in Second Language Acquisition: Empirical Evidence across Languages (pp. 267-293). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Ortega, L (2014). Trying out theories on interlanguage: Description and explanation over 40 years of L2 negation research. In Z.-H. Han & E. Tarone (Eds.), Interlanguage: Forty years later (pp. 179-203). Amsterdam/Philadelphia. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Pallotti, G. (2010). Doing interlanguage analysis in school context. In I. Bartning, M. Martin & I. Vedder (Eds.), Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: intersections between SLA and language testing research (pp. 159-191). European second language association 2010.
Pica, T. (1983). Adult Acquisition of English as a Second Language Under Different Conditions of Exposure. Language Learning, 33 (4), 465-497.
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Studies in Bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Pienemann, M. (Eds.) (2005). Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Pienemann, M. (2005b). An introduction to Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann (Eds.), Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory (pp.61-85). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Pienemann, M. & Keßler, J.-U. (2011). Studying Processability theory: An introductory textbook. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing company.
Pienemann, M. & Keßler, J.-U. (2012). Processability theory. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 228-247). New York and London: Routledge. Taylor&Francis Group.
Philipsson, A. (2007). Interrogative Clauses and Verb Morphology in L2 Swedish: Theoretical Interpretations of Grammatical Development and Effects of Different Elicitation Tehniques (Doctoral thesis, Stockholm University, Sweden). Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:197193/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
Sakai, H. (2008). An analysis of Japanese university students' oral performance in English using processability theory. Elsevier System, 36 (4), 534-549.
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10 (3), 209-231.
Spinner, P. (2011). Second Language Assessment and Morphosyntactic Development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 529-561.
Tang, H. & Zhang, Y. (2015). An Investigation of Chinese Students' Acquisition of Oral and Written English through the Measurement of Processability Theory. International Journal of Apllied Linguistics & English Literature, 4 (2), 207-211.
Tarone, E. (1983). On the Variability of Interlanguage Systems. Applied Linguistics, 4 (2), 142-164.
Zhang, X. & Latolf, J.P. (2015). Natural or Artificial: Is the Route of L2 Development Teachable? Language Learning, 65 (1), 152-180.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 European Journal of Social Science Education and Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
